Publish or perish as citation metrics used to analyze scientific output in the humanities: international case studies in economics, geography, social sciences, philosophy and history
A. Baneyx. Publish or perish as citation metrics used to analyze scientific output in the humanities: international case studies in economics, geography, social sciences, philosophy and history. Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, 56(6):363–371, December 2008.
Abstract : Traditionally, the most commonly used source of bibliometric data is the Thomson ISI Web of Knowledge, in particular the
(Social) Science Citation Index and the Journal Citation Reports, which provide the yearly Journal Impact Factors. This
database used for the evaluation of researchers is not advantageous in the humanities, mainly because books, conference
papers, and non-English journals, which are an important part of scientific activity, are not (well) covered. This paper presents
the use of an alternative source of data, Google Scholar, and its benefits in calculating citation metrics in the humanities.
Because of its broader range of data sources, the use of Google Scholar generally results in more comprehensive citation
coverage in the humanities. This presentation compares and analyzes some international case studies with ISI Web of
Knowledge and Google Scholar. The fields of economics, geography, social sciences, philosophy, and history are focused on
to illustrate the differences of results between these two databases. To search for relevant publications in the Google Scholar
database, the use of “Publish or Perish” and of CleanPoP, which the author developed to clean the results, are compared.
Key words: Web of Science, Google Scholar, citation analysis, bibliometrics, research evaluation in the humanities, Publish